Membres

Chrysalis MG consulting | Leadership series - Leading through ambiguity and uncertainty Deciding well when you don't have the full picture

Leading through ambiguity and uncertainty Deciding well when you don't have the full picture

A client said to me recently, "I keep waiting for when things will be clear enough to decide." 

But clarity is a luxury few leaders can't afford anymore. Markets shift mid-quarter. The data needed for a decision doesn't yet exist. And meanwhile, your team is looking for direction. Frameworks exist for strategy and budget, but deciding well under uncertainty, and doing it with confidence, requires a different capability.   

As an Executive coach, I help leaders sustain trust through ambiguity. Here are my observations.  

1. Certainty is a promise you cannot keep There is a common assumption that leadership means projecting certainty, stating a direction with total conviction.  But there is a difference between certainty and confidence. When circumstances are shifting, you can quickly lose credibility. Confidence is more honest and durable; it tends to build trust.  
2. Speculation is dangerous and builds up anxiety Under pressure, the instinct is to describe a shifting situation as more settled than it is, assuming that acknowledging uncertainty will unsettle the team.  In my experience, it is almost always the opposite. Teams are more anxious speculating about what their leader is NOT saying. Honesty is a better posture; "We don't yet know how this will affect us. Here is what we are watching now."  This is a better experience than a vague reassurance followed by an unexplained pivot later on. The former builds trust and is accurate. The latter erodes trust slowly.   
3. Differing decisions until “you know better”, is not sustainable One trap I see often is treating additional data as the solution to uncertainty: wait for the next report, seek one more opinion. We usually differ decisions that we are uncomfortable to make. But the real question is “What is stopping you from making a decision today?" The honest answer is rarely "I have insufficient data." It is about fear of being wrong, or discomfort with the consequences.  
4. People can tolerate ambiguity about long-term if they have clarity on immediate focus  Uncertainty about the broader direction is manageable but uncertainty about what to do next week produces disengagement and burnout. Under uncertain times, I encourage leaders to anchor their team in taking small steps: ”what is expected this week, how progress will be assessed, and how decisions will be revisited".   
5. Steadiness is “contagious” and more influential than any five-year plan. There is a common misconception that leading through ambiguity depends on superior judgment, an ability to see what others cannot.   Teams don't need their leader to have every answer. They need to trust their leader will not panic, or withhold relevant information. When that trust is established, ambiguity stops being a crisis factor but rather an environment they can work in.   

Next week: The Shift from authority to influence